The Revision of the EWC Directive
In the year 1999 the Directive on European Works Councils (EWC Directive) should be revised. However the European
Commission started the revision procedure only in April 2004 and the second stage of consultations in March 2005. A study
of Manchester University, UK, published in November 2005, using the interview results of more than 470 EWC members shows
the need for the legislator to act. In September 2006 the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) voted with
majority in favor of a revision of the EWC Directive and put the European Commission under pressure. This presented finally
a bill on July 2nd, 2008 which has become effective on June 5th, 2009.
The past history
The valid EWC Directive dates of the year 1994 and intended a revision in article 15 already for 1999. This issue has a
high priority for trade unions, so the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) presented precise change suggestions on
the directives' wording already in December 1999.
In November 2002, the ETUC organized a conference in Århus (Denmark) under the motto "Towards more
influence", in which several hundred EWC members and trade union officials from all over Europe took part (see
photo). They discussed about the role of the European Works Councils in restructuring cases, about the improvement of the
information and consultation procedures as well as about the legal inforcement of the EWC rights. The detailed meeting
report lists numerous case studies and summarizes the discussions.
|Report of the EWC conference in Århus|
At this meeting the European Commission had announced a revision of the EWC directive. At first it wanted to wait for a
statement over the practical application of the EWC directive of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC),
however. The EESC is a consultative body of the EU which consists of representatives of the employers, the employees and
other groups. This statement which has been available since September 2003 could therefore be only a compromise of
different interests and provide a rather neutral look at the topic. Though the paper is the first assessment of the EWC
directive since 1994 which was worked out by employer and employees' side jointly.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee|
However, this statement changed nothing at the fundamentally different opinions. While trade unions require an expansion
of the EWC information and consultation rights, the employers block any change. For example the European employers'
organisation for the metal, engineering and technology based industries (WEM) stated that a revision of the EWC Directive
would come too early and wouldn't be necessary in the course of EU enlargement.
The European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) had rendered its demands to the amendment of the EWC Directive more
precisely in a strategy paper covering 26 points in February 2004. It contains important aspects for the improvement of
the EWC work, however, is regarded as a "pious list of things desired" by many against the background of the
political power conditions. Some voices within the trade unions demand a concentration on select main points for the
amendment, what is more beneficial than maximum demands with which one would push at the employers' federations "on
||Strategy paper of the
European Trade Union Confederation|
The beginning of the legislation process
On April 20th, 2004 the European Commission invited the social partners - the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)
and the European employers' federations - officially for a statement and started the legislation process on the revision
of the EWC Directive with that. An abstract of the reasons for the hearing is found in the
press release of the European Commission.
|The consultation of the European Commission|
(April 20th, 2004)
The questions to the social partners referred primarily to
how best the potential of European works councils can be fully realised
in which direction the EU could get active and
which role the social partners themselves could primarily play.
With the last question the European Commission wanted to sonder whether the social partners are willing to present a
common, independent suggestion on a new version of the EWC directive. An invitation for such negotiations had left without
resonance sometimes within the years before 1994 because the employers' organisations - especially the British CBI
(Confederation of British Industry) - regarded an EWC directive simply as superfluous. Meanwhile the official answers of
the social partners are available:
the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)|
(May 19th, 2004)
In their statements the employers voiced in favor of the start of negotiations with the trade unions, they don't want a
change at the wording of the law, though. Practical points of reference or guidelines for the enterprises shall be
developed into the application of the existing Directive instead. They demanded of the European Commission to stop the
second round of the consultations.
At first the social partners reached an agreement on June 23rd, 2004 to discuss case studies about the work of European
works councils on two events. These so-called "social partner seminars" took place in Brussels on September
23/24th and on October 27/28th, 2004. The presented case studies were then evaluated by a working group formed from six
representatives of the employers and the trade unions each. On March 1st, 2005 they presented a thesis paper which
summarized the most important aspects and the detailed description of all case studies followed on March 17th, 2005. The
ETUC executive committee took position from the trade union view on 15/16 March 2005.
|The evaluation of
the social partner seminars|
(March 1st, 2005)
of the ETUC on the evaluation of the social partner seminars|
(March 15/16th, 2005)
description of the case studies in the wording|
(March 17th, 2005)
Beginning of the second stage of the legislation procedure
The new EU commissioner for employment and social affairs, Vladimír pidla, had approved a revision of the EWC
Directive already on September 27th, 2004 during a hearing of the European Parliament in the context of his nomination (see
photo). pidla, who took up his office on November 22nd, 2004 wanted to start the second stage of the consultations
as part of the legislation process as soon as the evaluation of the social partner seminars would be ready.
After the European Trade Union Confederation had asked pidla in writing on January 14th, 2005 to accelerate the
legislation procedure (see press release), the European Commission presented a paper on March 31st, 2005 which is
regarded as the second round of the consultations.
In a communication compounding 15 pages it commented on the topics "European Works Councils" and
"restructurings" and requested to the European social partners,
"to intensify ongoing work and to start negotiations with a view to reaching an agreement among themselves on the
requisite ways and means for promoting best practice in the way that European works councils operate, with a view to
making them more effective, more especially as regards their role as agents for change".
|Communication of the European Commission|
(March 31st, 2005)
The social partners commented on this in the middle of July 2005. The European employers' confederation UNICE still
argues, the legislation procedure is neither desirable nor necessary. The European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) would
like to come to the adoption of an improved Directive as quickly as possible and therefore finds fault, that there is a
lack of a concrete deadline on the part of the European Commission and no suggestion were made of it with regard to the
contents to a new EWC Directive. Furthermore the ETUC criticizes the combination of legislation procedures regarding
"European works councils" and "restructurings". An EWC doesn't only deal with restructuring issues and
restructuring is no exclusive EWC topic - so the central statement of the ETUC.
||Statement of the Union of Industrial and Employers Confederations of Europe (UNICE)|
(July 14th, 2005)
Statement of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)|
The European Parliament intervened in the debate on January 26th, 2006. The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
"regrets that the second phase consultation on the European Works Council is only a minor subchapter encompassed
in a broader Commission Communication, and calls on the Commission ... to launch a proper second phase consultation
offering social partners the opportunity to negotiate."
Report of the European Parliaments' Committee on Employment and Social Affairs|
(January 26th, 2006)
A demand of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) was taken up with that. The report shall soon be approved as a
resolution in the plenum of the European Parliament. If the employers still decide to start negotiations with the trade
unions anyway, then they have nine months time for it. If they reach a joint regulation, this text will become effective
as a new EWC Directive with a great probability.
During the Social Summit on March 23rd, 2006 in Brussels representatives of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)
and the European employers' federations presented their joint work programme for the years 2006 - 2008 to the governments
of the EU countries. Although issues like strengthening the social dialog in central and Eastern Europe or dealing with
company restructurings are named, a decisive point is missing: the revision of the EWC Directive is no topic. On the same
day the European employers' confederation UNICE presented a study which shows how employers and employee representatives
deal with restructurings in different countries.
Programme of the European Social Partners 2006-2008|
report on restructuring|
(March 23rd, 2006)
A new study shows the need for the legislator to act
Prof. Dr. Jeremy Waddington from the University of Manchester presented first results of a large-scale examination to a
conference of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) in Brussels on November 4th, 2005. On behalf of several
European trade union federations he had questioned more than 470 members in 196 European works councils out of all
industry sectors from 24 countries about the problems arising in their EWC. This study shows where European works
councils are dependent on improved framework conditions and support.
The minimum requirements on information and consultation as specified in the Directive are not being met - so the central
statement of Prof Waddington. As a result, the intentions of the legislator regarding information and consultation in
multi-national companies are not being implemented in practice.
||Interview with Prof Dr Jeremy Waddington|
(during the conference on November 4th, 2005 in
||Summary of the research results|
||Statistical data of the survey|
European Economic and Social Committee demands revision of the EWC Directive
On September 13th, 2006 the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) decided in Brussels on an opinion under the
title "European Works Councils: a new role in promoting European integration" initiated by the trade unions'
side. The text contains the clear demand for a revision of the EWC Directive, what is declined by employers' side
vehemently. The decision therefore means a sharp defeat for the employers' federations. Even if decisions of the EESC
aren't definite, the European Commission is now under political pressure to present a wording for a new EWC Directive.
The opinion of the EESC in the wording|
European Parliament also demands revision of the EWC Directive
The European Parliament in Strasbourg demanded in a resolution on May 10th, 2007 to update the legal provisions for
information and consultation and particularly the EWC Directive. The EU Commission shall present a concrete time schedule.
Already on April 25th, 2007 a discussion took place whereby several Members of Parliament used current examples like
Airbus, Alcatel-Lucent, Delphi Systems and Volkswagen to highlight the need for action of the legislator.
The debate in the European Parliament|
The resolution of the European Parliament in the wording|
Trade unions increase the demand for a revision
Shortly before the debate in the European Parliament and exactly three years after the beginning of the revision procedure
the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) convened about 200 European works council members for a meeting in Brussels
on April 20th, 2007. In the presence of Social Commissioner pidla and the European employers' confederation
BusinessEurope they stressed the demand for a revision of the EWC Directive. During this meeting a documentation on
methods of action for European works councils in the course of restructuring was presented, covering cases like General
Motors, InBev, RWE Energy and Dim Branded Apparel.
||ETUC press release
about the meeting|
||The documentation about EWC methods of action|
The ETUC congress, which met in Seville (Spain) from May 21st to 24th, 2007 also asked for strengthening the European
works councils. It named the key activities in a manifesto:
"fight delocalisation, stimulate negotiations on restructuring and provide a stronger framework of information,
consultation and involvement, including involving independent experts on restructuring."
||Full text of the ETUC Seville Manifesto|
Interview with the person in charge of EWC at the European Trade Union Confederation
At the congress the head of the ETUC was regularly newly-elected. Since then the Deputy General Secretary Reiner Hoffmann
(photo) from Germany is responsible for the topic employee participation, which also includes the European works councils.
In the interview with EWC News he explained the demands of the trade unions on the legislator.
→ The interview with Reiner Hoffmann
Also works councils call for the revision
Not only unions, but also EWC members are urgently calling for a revision of the EWC Directive. In a survey, the majority
of them supported an expansion of their participation rights. While newer EWC agreements increasingly go beyond the minimum
legal requirements, there are still many other companies not wanting to shake the original so-called "voluntary"
schemes, adopted until 1996.
One ot these companies is Siemens, whose European Works Council ("Siemens Europe Committee" - SEC) wrote an
open letter to the European Commission in July 2006. Examples are also the letters, in which the European works councils
of HeidelbergCement and SGL Carbon in 2004 had formulated its demand for a revision of the EWC Directive. Other letters of
European works councils are aimed in the same direction.
The letter of the Siemens Europe Committee|
||The letter of the EWC of HeidelbergCement|
||The letter of the EWC of SGL Carbon|
of the EWC of Ford|
Employers now very concerned
While the debate has been treated since the beginning of the legislative procedure in April 2004 by the employers rather
casually, has in recent weeks concentrated their lobbying behind the scenes considerably. It is suggested that it's now
"getting serious". On 10th October 2007 the German employers president Dieter Hundt (see photo on the right)
wrote to social Commissioner pidla to prevent the second and decisive phase of consultation on the revision of the EWC
Directive. It would "harm the social dialogue", said Hundt. On 15th October 2007 the DGB executive board turned
to pidla to confirm him in his plan.
European Commission gives the green light
On 23rd October 2007 the European Commission in Brussels (photo) adopted its work programme for the year 2008. There, a
revision of the EWC Directive is explicitly mentioned. The decision of the European Commission is a political precedent of
the first rank.
Press release for the adoption of the work programme 2008 |
||The work programme 2008 in the wording|
The president of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, emphasized his determination for the revision of the EWC
Directive on 13th November 2007 in a speech to the European Parliament. What policy choices are to be expected by the EU
legislator in the coming days and weeks? The editors of EWC News asked Social Affairs Commissioner Vladimír pidla (photo)
in Brussels more precisely.
→ Full text of the interview with Vladimír pidla
Completely surprising the European employers' association BusinessEurope finally declared on 2nd April 2008 the end of its
years of blockade and in favor of direct negotiations with the unions. Unlike the adoption of the EWC Directive in 1994,
continental European employers' federations could enforce this time a pragmatic solution against the resistance of British
industry. It was not an easy decision for the employers, but the pressure of trade unions, European Parliament and the
European Commission had increased in recent months. Without willingness to compromise the further legislative process would
hardly have been influenced by the employers.
Letter from the employers' federations to the European Commission|
(April 2nd, 2008)
(April 3rd, 2008)
ETUC conference in Barcelona
Under the motto "European Works Councils - in Europe and Beyond" the ETUC had invited to a conference from June
29th until July 1st, 2004 in Barcelona. A study compounding 81 pages on the revision of the EWC directive was presented
Download of the documentation
The members of the Training and Consulting Net "euro-workscouncil.net" are available to inform about the legal
situation and show possibilities of an improvement in the EWC agreement in your next EWC meeting. In a survey among German
EWC members we had collected in summer 2004 numerous points which are particularly important to practitioners.
|List of points
desired for the revision|
(Survey among EWC members in summer 2004)